[WT]  [Home] [Manage]

[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]
Posting mode: Reply
Name
Email
Subject   (reply to 48)
Message
File
Password  (for post and file deletion)
  • Supported file types are: GIF, JPG, PNG
  • Maximum file size allowed is 1000 KB.
  • Images greater than 200x200 pixels will be thumbnailed.
  • Currently 335 unique user posts. View catalog

  • Blotter updated: 2011-11-20 Show/Hide Show All

File 127116597975.jpg - (10.34KB , 300x225 , 161049_lactation.jpg )
48 No. 48
Dear /milk/,

this may seem disgusting but I guess this is the only place that I can talk about it.

Recently my girlfriend has started to suckle on my nipples during sex, the thing is, from visiting /milk/ and reading about it I know that with regular physical stimulation on a certain time period even males can lactate, that would be no problem since me and her share the lactation fetish, however, I've always had my own share of man boobs and I'm afraid that making them lactate would turn them into bigger, womanly breasts and that they would stay like that forever. (pic related)

Anyone here had any experience (or knowledge about) with male lactation?
>> No. 49
I wouldn't worry about it.

The amount of stimulation required is significant.

Unless you two are having sex and she's sucking on your nipples for 3 hours a day over 6 months, it's highly unlikely that your nipple play will produce anything close to lactation.
>> No. 50
Women are sort of designed to be able to nurse, as they possess the proper hormones in abundance and the neurological wiring to make it more possible. But no, they would not turn into womanly breasts. They'd still look like ugly, hairy moobs.

I think you should prevent her from doing that. In fact, show her who wears the mammaries in the relationship! Get her moo'ing.

It would still take 15 minutes per boob (the reflex 'gets bored' after longer than that,) 4-8 times a day before you got drops, and then it'd take months longer to work up a bigger supply. That's for women. I'd wager it'd take longer for a man that doesn't gorge on soy and eroded plastic artificial hormones all day.
>> No. 56
Male lactation does exist, but is often started in puberty. It can be started through enormous stimulation+dietary supplements.

But it's highly unlikely to ever, no matter how much she plays with them. If you want to temporarily have real tits, look into saline injection.
>> No. 68
There were cases of GIs who smoked heavily in vietnam (marijuana) having their breasts grow/lactate

something to do with a female hormone which is stimulated by pot...

the more you know
>> No. 393
>>68
Pretty sure you're thinking of heroine or morphine there.
>> No. 417
>>393
nope, pot will raise estrogen/lower testosterone in males
>> No. 426
>>417
[citation needed]
>> No. 427
>>426
http://www.ukcia.org/research/EndocrineEffects.pdf

GYNECOMASTIA
Gynecomastia is defined as the accumulation of breast tissue in men and results from increases in the circulating estrogen/androgen ratio. Marijuana has been associated with the development of gynecomastia in an early case series, but a case control study showed no association. Given the effects of marijuana on the HPG axis in males and the possibility that noncannabinoid components of marijuana smoke have affinity to the estrogen receptor, an association with gynecomastia is plausible but has not been convincingly demonstrated.
[Return] [Entire Thread] [Last 50 posts]


Delete post []
Password  
Report post
Reason